Search for: "Precision Contracting, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 1,192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm by blaw.firm.admin
The post Blog Series – An Ounce of Precision in Contracts appeared first on Business Law Firm LLC. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm by blaw.firm.admin
The OLB Group, Inc., 2023 NY Slip Op 30968(U), the court was asked to interpret two separate clauses in a contract governing how to resolve disputes regarding the sale/purchase of a business (M&A deal). [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 11:52 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
Autobuilders General Contracting Services, Inc. illustrates just how important the precise language in a construction contracts is, and just how important it is to have a well-written contract. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
Precision Pipeline Inc. involved the construction of portions of the “Appalachian Gateway” pipelines. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:40 am by Berniard Law Firm
That’s precisely the scenario that unfolded for Star Financial Services, Inc., a prominent ATM operator, in their dealings with Cardtronics, USA, Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:48 am by Myanna Dellinger
And still the contract does not specify precisely what the payments due are supposed to be for. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Taras Rudnitsky
The Law Office of Andreu, Palma and Andreu, PL from Miami, FL (attorneys Jorge Palma and Diamelyn Cepero) filed a debt collection lawsuit against our clients on behalf of debt collector Precision Recovery Analytics, Inc. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
It is precisely because the law’s ordinary assumptions about the bargaining process do not apply that relief against an improvident bargain is justified. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 8:16 am by Gregory Weber
GAO in the past has upheld that sole-source contracts are allowable so long as the agency has a reasonable justification for the sole-source contract. Recently GAO re-examined what constitutes a reasonable “justification and award” for a sole-source contract.   In Wamore, Inc., B-417450 et al. [read post]
Swegon North America, Inc., the Court of Appeal held that if the termination provisions governing “cause” of an employment contract violate the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”), those provisions are not severable and the entire termination provision of the employment agreement is void and unenforceable. [read post]